CK - just a bit of fun - for a convicted anti woke nutter (me).
Here's the rest of the article :-
"I am so sick of the demonising of ordinary, decent people by their supposed betters, aren’t you? Judging by the headlines over the past week, it is astonishing how the media has been persuaded to categorise the common-sense views of millions of Britons as utterly beyond the pale. Parents who worry about the warping of children’s minds by highly ideological, self-styled “role models” are somehow cast as the bad guys. (What is “far-Right” about not wanting your bewildered five-year-old to be read nursery rhymes by a drag queen?) Men and women with genuine concerns about the presence in their community of undocumented young males, from parts of the world which often hold appalling views about women and girls, are caricatured as racist, ignorant and, inevitably, “far-Right”.
Yet, at the same time, we learn that four Afghan “boys” who arrived in small boats across the Channel last year have just been arrested in connection with the alleged rape of a 15-year-old girl at a school in Dover. So, are all of us who warned that there was a potential safeguarding issue around putting asylum seekers of indeterminate age into British schools still “far-Right”?
Over the weekend, I watched Grooming Gangs, a salutary documentary on GB News about the horror story of 1,400 girls being raped, trafficked, even murdered, in Rotherham, largely by Pakistani taxi-drivers and kebab-shop-owners. (Later, it was revealed that tens of thousands of girls had been similarly abused in towns and cities across the UK).
Back in 2003, the journalist Andrew Norfolk started looking into concerns raised by Labour MP Ann Cryer about gangs which were targeting vulnerable, underage girls, but Norfolk was apparently put off because the story “felt like a Right-wing fantasy”. Unfortunately, that appalling, far-Right “scaremongering” turned out to be true.
As the worst child-sexual-exploitation scandal in British history unfolded in plain sight, the middle-class establishment averted its eyes. It fell to a handful of courageous, working-class women like Jayne Senior (a senior worker with local youth project Risky Business) and policewoman Maggie Oliver to fight the brutalised girls’ corner against furious, politically-correct resistance. Senior recalled her horrified astonishment at being told by councillors that “we were breaching their human rights – but it was never the human rights of the children, it was the human rights of the perpetrators”. Sound familiar?
I thought of Senior and the shameful, decades-long cover-up in Rotherham after the riot in Knowsley when a news story appeared saying “politicians urged to take stand against violence towards asylum seekers”.
When did you last hear of politicians being urged to stand up for local residents against unvetted, illegal migrants inflicted on them because their government cannot police the UK’s borders and has lost control of immigration?
Let me be clear. Violence is never justified under any circumstances and asylum seekers in the Suites Hotel, which was surrounded by protesters, were very scared as fireworks were thrown. That is not the British way.
Although the far-Right didn’t lead the protest, a group called Patriotic Alternative had delivered leaflets in the area with the slogan, “5 Star Hotels for Migrants While Brits Freeze” and some of their members were spotted at the demo.
The blame, however, lies squarely with the state which has allowed the migration crisis to spiral out of control and now seeks to pass the buck to people who never voted for a shocking number of the country’s hotels to be requisitioned at a cost of £5.5 million a day to mop up the almighty mess. It’s the Government which has created these inflammatory conditions.
Unlike other European nations, the United Kingdom has not seen the rise of a far-Right or neo-Nazi party. That happy state is now in jeopardy as justifiable public annoyance is stigmatised as racist hatred by a sanctimonious class that largely escapes the consequences of its own idealistic opinions.
If the asylum seekers currently housed in underprivileged places like Knowsley and Skegness were put in a camp on, say, leafy Barnes Common, how long do you reckon the middle-class idealism would last?
Let me leave you with the devastating insight of Colin, a reader who responded when I asked how on earth someone like Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai (found guilty of stabbing 21-year-old Tom Roberts to death) was allowed into this country posing as a 14-year-old asylum seeker.
“Because the default position has to be accepted as the result of a court case,” explained Colin. “Last year, the claim of a migrant to be a ‘child’ was not accepted by Border Force and they classified the individual as an adult – a decision proven correct by an age test which confirmed the man was, in fact, over 25. The man’s lawyers argued that the officers were not qualified to make that decision and he should have been treated as a minor until the tests proved otherwise. The judge agreed. Costs were awarded against Border Force and the migrant was awarded compensation despite the fact he knowingly made false claims.
“Essentially, he was compensated because Border Force officials would not believe his lies. Now, Border Force officers are instructed to accept any claim that a person is a child.”
Most sane people would still be horrified by what Colin reveals about our immigration system, although some dozy dolts would no doubt defend it on the increasingly laughable grounds of “human rights” If the Government and a liberal elite continue to stigmatise and silence working-class people for a perfectly rational reaction to policies which threaten their children and their communities then I’m afraid they must prepared to reap the whirlwind.
Are those who think this way far-Right? Or could it possibly be that we are just right? /color]"
The DM would never carry that CK, (IMVVHO). Just fun. ATB