https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/d0cc6561-6ab9-46ea-8d6d-f07ac0cf136d at 19:04:33It seems that MP Andrew Bridgen has some chequered history but MP Danny Kruger seems well measured in his approach - his ideas for consideration as put to the earlier Parliamentary Committee, were IMO quite reasonable:-
1. review the policy of giving the vax to children
2. examine safety aspects in the light of adverse vaccine reactions and damage
3. the funding of MHRA should not be even indirectly dependent on Big Pharma
4. adverse reactions and vaccine damage should be compensated
I particularly agree with Kruger's idea that if some points need to be debunked then the discussion around them must be freely held. I'll be interested to see that.
Other points in my mind are that the Pfizer vax was never researched for transmissibility but was 'sold to us as being effective in that respect. The original recommendation was that vax should be for health and care workers and the vulnerable only. The measure of absolute risk has been held not to justify widespread use of the vax. 40,000 careworkers lost their jobs for refusing the vax. Etc.
Bridgen claims there is a 'conspiracy of silence' even as we learn more about how the vaccines were introduced and how they performed. I think that may be so. He mentioned some other examples where the truth was hard to find - for me the best example of that was decades of widespread child abuse in the RC Church, (as portrayed in the film, 'Spotlight'), that was 'hidden' (?) for so long.
That's it. Sorry to go on I'm done

« Last Edit: December 19, 2022, 06:01:42 AM by Roger »
''If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough'' - Albert Einstein